During the end of 2019, I designed a preview experience for content editors working on Gatsby websites.
Gatsby websites pull content from multiple sources, so content creators can’t easily figure out how to edit the content they see on their live site. This means that though developers love building a Gatsby site, content creators don’t love working on the site.
Gatsby Preview attempts to make content creators happy. I had these sticky notes by my desk to remind myself of the main goal of Gatsby Preview: make marketers (content creators) happy.
After interviewing several current customers, I created this user flow to reflect how they actually used our alpha version of Gatsby Preview and what their emotional state was during their flow.
I proposed the following quick win.
Main goal: speed up the editing and feedback cycle.
After presenting this user flow to my coworkers, I observed that they didn’t know much about content creator’s needs.
I created a plan to do more research, got feedback from coworkers, and got approved for the project. Here’s my proposed research project, filled out with answers.
Marketing Workflow Executive Summary
After contacting developer customers and asking for intros to their content creator coworkers without much success, I felt blocked in the project. It occurred to me I could draw out my own user flow for the steps to a successful research project and identify my own pain points.
After identifying that that recruiting customers via Twitter and email wasn’t working for content creators as well as did for developer customers, I realized I didn’t have to rely on customers. I personally know many marketers and writers, so I reached out on Facebook and Twitter and quickly filled up my calendar with meetings.
Another idea to make recruiting easier was to incentivize developers to give me referrals by placing them on a list of people who get to test alpha and beta features. I did this for later projects.
To make sure I didn’t ask leading questions, I planned broad, open-ended questions and tested them with a couple content creator coworkers.
If needed, ask more specifically what pain points they experience when trying to be successful at their job and the measures of success they mentioned in answer to question 9.
After interviewing 8 content creators (who did not use Gatsby) and many Gatsby Preview customers, I created a list of personas and their jobs to be done along with an example of what life is like for them.
Content creators expect to see content and edit it so they can improve the content’s impact on its audience - increase leads, clickthroughs, etc.
Jane is a content creator who is helping launch a new version of an women's shaving supplies site. She sees a sub-header she wants to edit to make it more SEO-friendly, and has to go hunt around in their headless CMS to answer questions like “Where does this header live? Where can I edit it? Is it even in this CMS?”
This is a tour through Jane's eyes.
Step 1: Content creator sees a problem on the website.
Step 2: Content creator searches for the text in the CMS and gets no search results
Step 3: Content creator goes to Slack to ask their developer coworkers for help editing the copy.
Step 4: It turns out the copy is hard-coded, and the developers have to edit it.
Marketing and content managers expect to monitor and request changes to the site’s performance and content to make sure the site is reaching marketing goals, like lead generation. Ideally, they’d like to set a performance budget and maintain it.
Anarik manages a team of marketers and they launched a new women’s shaving products website 6 months ago with excellent lighthouse scores; the website’s performance has been steadily decreasing and he’s not sure how to stop it from happening.
Stakeholders expect to assess planned changes to the websites and/or pages they own and give feedback so that the site and/or page reaches business goals
The PM who manages website that hosts the blog can’t keep track of when the marketing team requests design changes to the blog. Most of the time it’s fine, but every once in a while she really needs to review their proposals before they get implemented.
Developers expect to get assignments to improve/fix the Preview instance itself or any part of the website it manages, know what part of the code their assignment relates to, and be able to collaborate/ask questions about their assignments
Luca gets random Slack messages with requests to update the company’s marketing site all the time, and has to ask people to please put requests in Jira with a screenshot. Sometimes it takes several days for the issue to actually become clear.
To avoid becoming blind to opportunities outside our product’s current scope, I interviewed people who didn’t use Gatsby so I could see the root problems of website creation, regardless of whether a content creator uses Gatsby.
First, website creation is often inefficient. Methods like screenshots and/or comments sent via email and Slack are inefficient because the comments are out-of-context, immediately become out-of-date, and are disconnected from tasks/issue workflows.
A solution that speeds up the feedback cycle must include:
Second, even if the website creation method is perfect, the content of what people say can still be imperfect. People often give unwise feedback and struggle with making decisions or coming to consensus when designing or revamping a website.
A solution that helps teams make better website decisions must include:
I looked through many competitor’s products and started sketching some ideas. My favorite inspirations are Figma’s commenting system (which isn’t perfect) and WordPress’s Gutenberg editor (which also has its flaws).
I proposed the following MVP for a next iteration.
This was a really light-weight MVP proposal. See this design document for my ideas for phase 2 and phase 3 of the product.